Previous Section
    Next Section
    Table of Contents
    Financials
    PDF

Other Related Menus

    10Q Filings
    10K Filings
    SEC Filings
  
         

FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9. Acquisitions and Dispositions

 

In October 2007, we acquired interests in three South Texas fields in the Maverick Basin from Escondido Resources, LP. The property interests are located in the Sun TSH field in La Salle County, the Briscoe Ranch field primarily in Dimmit County, and the Las Tiendas field in Webb County. We refer to these properties as the Cotulla properties. We paid approximately $248.2 million in cash for these interests including purchase price adjustments. After taking into account internal acquisition costs of $2.5 million, our total cost was $250.7 million. We allocated $241.8 million of the acquisition price to “Proved Properties,” $8.9 million to “Unproved Properties,” and recorded a liability for $0.6 million to “Asset retirement obligation” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. We made these acquisitions to increase our exploration and development opportunities in South Texas. The revenues and expenses from these properties have been included in our accompanying consolidated statement of income from the date of acquisition forward; however, given that the acquisitions closed in the fourth quarter of 2007, these amounts were not material to our full year 2007 results.

In October 2006, we acquired interests in five South Louisiana fields. The property interests are located in: Bayou Sale, Horseshoe Bayou and Jeanerette fields (all located in St. Mary Parish), High Island field in Cameron Parish and Bayou Penchant field in Terrebonne Parish. We paid approximately $167.9 million in cash for these interests. After taking into account internal acquisition costs of $4.0 million, our total cost was $171.9 million. We allocated $143.1 million of the acquisition price to “Proved Properties,” $28.8 million to “Unproved Properties,” and recorded a liability for $11.5 million to “Asset retirement obligation” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. We made these acquisitions to increase our exploration and development opportunities in South Louisiana. The revenues and expenses from these properties have been included in our accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition forward; however, given the acquisitions closed in the fourth quarter of 2006, these amounts were not material to our full year 2006 results.

In December 2006, we acquired additional interests in our Lake Washington field. We paid approximately $20.0 million in cash for these interests. After taking into account internal acquisition costs of $0.4 million, our total cost was $20.4 million. We allocated $17.9 million of the acquisition price to “Proved Properties,” $2.5 million to “Unproved Properties,” and recorded a liability for $0.8 million to “Asset retirement obligation” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. This acquisition was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. We made this acquisition to increase our exploration and development opportunities in South Louisiana. The revenues and expenses from this acquisition have been included in our accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition forward; however, given the acquisition closed in December 2006, these amounts were not material to our full year 2006 results.

In April 2006, we sold our minority interest in the Brookeland natural gas processing plant for approximately $20.3 million in cash. Under the “full-cost” method of accounting for oil and natural gas property and equipment costs, the proceeds of this sale were applied against our oil and natural gas properties and equipment balance, and no gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.

In November 2005, we acquired interests in the South Bearhead Creek field in Central Louisiana. We paid approximately $24.3 million in cash for these interests. After taking into account internal acquisition costs of $2.6 million and assumed liabilities of $1.4 million, our total cost was $28.3 million. We allocated $26.2 million of the acquisition price to “Proved Properties,” $2.5 million to “Unproved Properties,” and recorded a liability for $0.4 million to “Asset retirement obligation” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In December 2006, we acquired additional interests in this field. We paid approximately $4.5 million in cash for these additional interests. After taking into account internal acquisition costs of $0.1 million, our total cost was $4.6 million. We allocated $4.1 million of the acquisition price to “Proved Properties” and $0.5 million to “Unproved Properties” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. These acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. We made these acquisitions to increase our exploration and development opportunities in this area. The revenues and expenses from these properties have been included in our accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date the acquisition closed. However, given the acquisitions closed in November 2005 and December 2006, these amounts were immaterial for both the 2005 and 2006 periods.

 

 
 

This page was last updated on Thursday, March 06, 2008 , at 12:02:38 PM .

Copyright © 1994-2008 by Swift Energy Company.
Click here to go to our home page or search page.
Please note the terms of use for the Swift Energy web site.
If you have comments or questions, see our feedback or requests pages.
Contact Swift Energy Company Stockholder Relations through e-mail info@swiftenergy.com or telephone (281) 874-2700.