Integrating Bright Ideas Throughout much of its 27-year history, our company has
strived to combine conventional oil and gas technologies with appropriate
advanced technologies in order to identify elusive pools of hydrocarbons in
the earth’s crust. Like other companies, we have historically relied on
geologists’ interpretations of well logs for wells already drilled in the
areas of interest, and whenever possible, we have correlated the geologists’
data with seismic data for the same areas. While the early seismic datasets
were usually limited in scope, recent advances in seismic technology have
resulted in an increasing number of more reliable datasets, which with the
proper processing and interpretation can yield three-dimensional images of
the earth’s substructure at depths that can be measured in miles. Other
seismic technologies can identify "bright spots" suggesting the possible
presence of hydrocarbons within subsurface structures. The result is a
series of improved techniques that can lower the risk of finding oil and
gas. With increasing numbers of three-dimensional seismic
datasets available for licensing, as well as many oil and gas companies
performing surveys to acquire their own data, more and more companies
engaged in exploration are developing computer-based techniques for
processing and interpreting the data, Swift Energy among them. Since 2004,
we have dedicated a significant portion of our exploratory effort to the
acquisition and analysis of three-dimensional seismic data. Moreover, we
have been digitally integrating our seismic data with geological data in
all-inclusive databases, and we can now report the initial results from the
application of our first integrated database in our South Louisiana Region
of operation. South Louisiana is one of four geographic regions in
which we have large field operations. We began operations there in 2001 when
we purchased our first interests in the Lake Washington Field in Plaquemines
Parish. Since then, we have added interests in several nearby parishes, to
the extent that the region held 53% of the company’s total year-end 2006
proved reserves. Because most of the reserves produced in the region to date
are long lived with individual wells producing for years, and because they
are predominantly crude oil that is in high demand, we have focused heavily
on this region during the past five years. Fortunately, it is also the
region that was the best candidate for building our first integrated
geophysical and geological database. Our second largest domestic region of operations is in
South Texas, where we acquired our first interests in the AWP Olmos Field in
McMullen County in 1988. This field also has long-lived reserves and has
been a steady producer for us for 18 years, with a mix of approximately 70%
natural gas and 30% liquid hydrocarbons. At year-end 2006, our South Texas
properties, including some interests outside the AWP Field, held 18% of the
company’s total reserves.
A third domestic region of operations called Toledo Bend
spans the Texas-Louisiana border. We began operations in Toledo Bend in
mid-1998 when we purchased properties in contiguous Texas counties and
Louisiana parishes and have since acquired other properties nearby. The
reserves in this region, which are approximately 65% crude oil, are largely
short lived and at year-end 2006 represented 14% of the company’s total
reserves. Our fourth geographic region of operations is located in
New Zealand, where we began operations following a 1999 discovery on the
country’s North Island. With subsequent property acquisitions, that region
at year-end 2006 held 13% of our total reserves, of which approximately half
was oil. In keeping with our emphasis on obtaining seismic databases, we
are considering a large three-dimensional seismic survey in New Zealand in
the future. These four regions have resulted from our long-term
strategy of concentrating our operations within specific geographic regions
and retaining operational control. At year-end 2006, we were operating 94%
of our total reserves base. Together, the four regions also fulfill our
criterion for maintaining a balanced reserves base. We, of course, are also always looking for other regions
that might fulfill our operational criteria, and during 2006 we participated
in a joint-venture onshore exploratory well in the Cook Inlet Basin of
Alaska. Although the well was unsuccessful, the area has multiple targets
with both oil and gas potential, and we are considering drilling a second
joint-venture well there in 2007. At year-end 2006 we were operating 1,012 wells throughout
our regions, including 39 service wells. During 2006 we completed 45 of 63
wells for an overall drilling success rate of 71%. But for the area covered
by the integrated database—our Lake Washington Field in South Louisiana—we
had an 86% success rate, completing 18 of 21 wells. For the years 2001 to
2006, our average drilling success rate for Lake Washington has been 76%.
Distribution of Swift Energy's Proved
Reserves
Proved Reservesa (Bcfe) Percent of Company's Reserves 13.8 11.5 aSee
definitions of proved reserves, proved developed reserves, and proved undeveloped reserves
on page 78. b
Distribution of Wells in Which Swift Owned Interests
aSwift is the operator of
973 producing wells and 39 service wells. The Company has interests in
1,085
producing wells and 51 service wells. bOther
South Louisiana includes the Bayou Sale, Horseshoe Bayou, Jeanerette, High
Island, and Bayou Penchant properties purchased during 2006. In 2006 our total company production increased 18% from
our hurricane-affected 2005 production to a record 70.2 billion cubic feet
equivalent (Bcfe), with our domestic production increasing 32% to a record
56.7 Bcfe, or 81% of the total. Of these amounts, Lake Washington
contributed 38.7 Bcfe, or 55% of our total company production. At the same
time, our year-end proved reserves increased 7% above our 2005 reserves to
816.8 Bcfe from a combination of both drilling successes and strategic
acquisitions. We added 72.8 Bcfe from drilling activities and 77.7 Bcfe from
strategic acquisitions, primarily in South Louisiana. At year-end, 455.8
Bcfe (56%) of our reserves were undeveloped. Our total capital expenditures for 2006 were $557.5
million, with $214.9 million spent on domestic development drilling and
supporting activities and $20.5 million spent on domestic exploration.
Domestic strategic property acquisitions totaled $200.5 million, with
another $51.1 million spent on domestic prospects. Corresponding costs in
New Zealand were $28.8 million on development drilling and associated
activities, $15.7 million on exploration, and $10.4 million on prospects. Our initial 2007 capital budget, which may increase as the year
progresses, is $350 million to $400 million, excluding property
acquisitions, with approximately 95% expected to cover domestic projects,
again primarily in South Louisiana. From this program we are anticipating a
total production increase of 7% to 10% above our 2006 production and a
proved reserves increase of 4% to 6% above year-end 2006 reserves. SOUTH LOUISIANA REGION Our South Louisiana properties increased considerably in
acreage and reserves during 2006, through both drilling and acquisitions. We
have anchor areas in three different fields in the region—Lake Washington,
Bay de Chene, and Cote Blanche Island—and through a large strategic
acquisition we added properties in five other fields during 2006. All the
anchor areas are located in inland waters, and drilling and completion
operations are conducted from barge-based rigs. The properties acquired in
2006 are largely land based, but the abundance of surrounding waters and
canals may lead to some barge-based operations in these fields as well. As
in the past several years, during 2006 we were the largest crude oil
producer in the state of Louisiana. It is in this region, first in Lake Washington and
subsequently in other areas, that we are building what we believe will
become the largest contiguous database of three-dimensional seismic data
reprocessed and integrated with geological data for the onshore of Louisiana
of any company in the industry. In assembling the database, we are merging
proprietary data from our own three-dimensional seismic surveys in our
anchor areas with licensed data for the same or nearby areas. We are
reprocessing all the original data from these various sources to very high
and consistent specifications, combining them with similarly collected
geological data. Eventually we will end up with a high-quality integrated
database that will extend across a number of parishes and will be entirely
proprietary to Swift. As the reprocessing is completed for specific areas,
the data immediately become an important tool for both identifying
exploratory prospects and selecting more precise locations for development
wells. As noted above and discussed further below, the first subset of this
tool has already been successfully used in Lake Washington. The expanding database will be particularly useful to us
for studying very deep target formations. Industry maps of South Louisiana
wells show that while essentially all the state’s southern parishes have
been heavily drilled, many areas exist where exploration wells exceeding
depths of 10,000 feet are sparse or nonexistent and wells drilled to 20,000
feet are rare. To properly assess these deep targets, we are performing
prestacked depth migration analyses of the data to account for possible
displacements in the visual images we produce by distortions introduced by
the extended times and distances traveled by the sound waves during the
surveys. These analyses are also required for targets near or beneath salt
domes, such as exist in a number of our fields. Work on expanding the database will be ongoing for several years, with up
to $13 million of our 2007 capital budget allocated for continuing efforts
on this project.
LAKE WASHINGTON
Our largest asset in South Louisiana is in the Lake
Washington Field located in Plaquemines Parish. During 2006, this field
alone provided 68% of our total domestic production. When we acquired our
first interests in the field in 2001, it was producing less than 1,000 gross
barrels of oil per day, and the net reserves that we acquired were estimated
at 7.7 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE). During the fourth quarter
of 2006, we produced an average of approximately 20,000 gross barrels per
day (18,700 net barrels per day) from the field, and its year-end proved
reserves (47.9% undeveloped) were 40.3 MMBOE, representing 29.6% of our
total year-end 2006 reserves. Primarily an oil field—year-end reserves were 93% crude
oil and NGLs—Lake Washington produces from multiple stacked Miocene sand
layers that radiate outward and downward from the surface of a centrally
located salt dome having surface depths that vary from 1,200 feet at its
peak down to about 14,000 feet over most of our acreage. The field, which is
covered by inland waters 2 feet to 12 feet deep, is heavily faulted so that
the sands are contained in many isolated reservoirs. The hydrocarbons in
each reservoir block tend to migrate upward into the higher regions of the
sand layers that are closest to the salt dome, and for fault blocks actually
abutting the dome, the higher regions lie against the dome’s surface. In
order to intercept as many of these as possible in each well, we employ
directional drilling from the barge-based rigs so that the well bores angle
down the slope of the dome’s surface. In general, we complete all the wells
in the field to sequentially produce from only one sand at a time, from the
deepest upward. From 2001 through 2006, we drilled 173 wells in Lake
Washington and completed 131 wells with an average net pay of 149 feet.
Together with wells acquired, we had 154 wells at year-end 2006. Our initial drilling in the field was primarily to
relatively shallow depths of 1,500 feet to 6,000 feet, where we consistently
found multiple oil pay zones in the stacked sands, some in sands not
previously known to have been productive. By 2003, our drilling activity had
increased to 58 wells, with 47 wells successfully completed. But because we
wanted to drill to deeper sands for which geological data were sparse and in
which we expected to find both oil and natural gas, we made the decision to
curtail our drilling program in 2004 in order to conduct a three-dimensional
seismic survey over our entire 55-square-mile acreage. These data were
immediately merged and reprocessed with additional licensed
three-dimensional seismic data for a 530-square-mile area northwest of Lake
Washington, and the results were available in time for use in determining
the locations of some of Lake Washington’s 2005 wells.
Our three domestic core regions—South Louisiana,
Toledo Bend, and South Texas—provide us with a balanced
portfolio of oil and gas properties with diversified production
profiles and an assortment of growth opportunities covering a
range of risks and potential rewards. Among the wells drilled in 2005 was a second-quarter
exploratory well on the first prospect identified by the new database—the
Newport prospect located on the northwest flank of the field’s salt dome.
This well found 44 feet of pay in a new sand at a depth of 10,418 feet, and
it tested at 1,823 barrels of oil and 1.32 million cubic feet of natural gas
(MMcf) per day. Because of the onslaught of Hurricane Katrina, the Lake
Washington drilling program was again curtailed until the fourth quarter of
2005 when both a Newport delineation well and another prospect—the Bondi
prospect five miles northwest of the salt dome—were drilled to depths of
12,736 feet and 13,649 feet, respectively. Both wells found multiple pay
zones that were highly productive. The remoteness of the Bondi prospect delayed its
contribution to Lake Washington’s production until a new flow line was
connected to the well in early 2007, but because the Newport prospect had
access to existing infrastructure, the 2006 Lake Washington drilling
program, in which 18 wells out of 21 wells drilled were completed, included
six more successful Newport delineation wells (two nonoperated with 50%
working interests). The six wells ranged in depth from 12,293 feet to 16,488
feet. The deepest well found pay in three sands and tested at 9,205 BOE per
day in one sand; however, the results for its deepest sands were
inconclusive, initiating an investigation of those sands with a prestacked
depth migration analysis of the three-dimensional seismic data. With its increasing production, the Lake Washington field
is once again approaching infrastructure production constraints, although we
have benefited over the past year from a three-year infrastructure upgrade
that increased the combined capacity of the field’s three production
processing platforms to 28,000 barrels of oil per day. To alleviate this
situation, we are currently building an additional $50 million processing
platform in the western portion of the field that will add an additional
10,000 BOE per day by mid-2008 and facilitate exploitation of the Bondi
prospect. At year-end 2006, we had three barge rigs operating in the field
and 109 identified drilling locations. Up to 24 development wells with
depths ranging from 4,000 feet to 15,000 feet are planned for the 2007 Lake
Washington program.
In late 2006, we acquired $20.4 million of additional
interests in the Lake Washington Field northeast and southeast of our
original acreage. The interests consist of 1.0 million BOE of proved
reserves that are 86% crude oil and 36% developed, with working interests
varying from 40% to 100%. The new properties cover 2,800 net acres, bringing
our total acreage in the field to 21,690 net acres and further ensuring that
Lake Washington will be a strong performer for us for years to come. BAY DE CHENE Bay de Chene covers 16,138 net acres and is located about
30 miles northwest of Lake Washington along the common boundary of Lafourche
Parish and Jefferson Parish, and, like Lake Washington, it produces from
multiple Miocene sands surrounding a central salt dome. When we acquired
this property, the field had estimated reserves of approximately 1.23
million BOE and was producing about 250 BOE per day. We initially shut it in
for facility upgrades and later for a series of July-September 2005 tropical
storms and hurricanes. After Hurricane Katrina, we continued the shut-in for
the remainder of the year as we focused on repairing storm damage at Lake
Washington. During the acquisition of Bay de Chene, we also licensed
the results of a three-dimensional seismic survey that had been specifically
performed for the field and in some areas overlapped the larger regional
database built for Lake Washington. During 2006, we improved the quality of
the Bay de Chene data by merging and reprocessing them with the earlier data
and subsequently used the results to determine the location of a Bay de
Chene exploratory well that was spudded in the field in late 2006. Also
during 2006, we drilled six development wells in the field, of which three
were successful. During 2007, Bay de Chene will be a field in which we
will carry out significant exploratory drilling. We plan to drill one or two
exploration wells in the field with depths between 14,500 feet to 19,000
feet. In addition, we plan to drill up to six Bay de Chene development wells
at depths of 10,000 feet to 14,000 feet. As in the Lake Washington Field,
the targets for all these wells will be derived from our integrated
geological and geophysical data set. During 2006, Bay de Chene provided 2.8% of our total
production and its year-end reserves represented 2.0% of our total reserves.
The reserves totaled 2.75 million BOE (42.4% undeveloped), a 123% increase
over the estimated purchased reserves. At year-end 2006, we had identified
five proved undeveloped locations in the field. COTE BLANCHE ISLAND In order to gain more knowledge about the field’s
substructure, we carried out a proprietary three-dimensional seismic survey
over 77 square miles in and around Cote Blanche Island early in 2006. At
year-end, the processing of these data was nearing completion. In the
meantime, we had drilled three development wells in the field, all of which
were successful. The first well was logged to a depth of 13,814 feet and
found 77 feet of net pay in its primary targeted sand. In 2007 we plan to
carry out numerous improvements in the field, including several workovers of
operating wells, and also to drill one deep well (to 17,500 feet). During 2006, Cote Blanche Island provided 1.6% of the
company’s total production and its year-end reserves represented 10.6% of
the company’s total reserves. The reserves totaled 14.5 million BOE, a 141%
increase over the estimated purchased reserves. At year-end, we had
identified 26 undeveloped locations in the area.
BAYOU SALE, HORSESHOE BAYOU, JEANERETTE, HIGH ISLAND, AND
BAYOU PENCHANT Bayou Sale and Horseshoe Bayou are adjacent to each other
and located 13 miles southeast of our anchor area Cote Blanche Island. They
produce from several formations at depths of 10,000 feet to 14,000 feet,
averaging 6.3 MMcfe net per day during the first six months of 2006.
Jeanerette is positioned on the flank of a large salt dome 12.5 miles north
of Cote Blanche Island and averaged 1.2 MMcfe net per day from the Planulina
sands at depths of 10,000 feet to 15,000 feet. We have already identified up
to 15 future development drilling opportunities for Bayou Sale and Horseshoe
Bayou and are considering several proved undeveloped locations for
Jeanerette. High Island in Cameron Parish is 65 miles west of Cote Blanche Island and
averaged approximately 2.0 MMcfe net from the Marg Howei
and Camerina sands between 15,000 feet and 17,000 feet. Bayou Penchant in
Terrebonne Parish is about 44 miles southeast of Cote Blanche Island and is
the only one of the five properties not operated by us. It produces from
Miocene sands at depths of 7,000 feet to 10,000 feet and averaged 2.5 MMcfe
net per day. We are reviewing several operational opportunities in both
these fields. The proximity of these newly acquired properties to Cote Blanche Island
greatly increases the value of the data obtained in our recent
three-dimensional seismic survey in that area. We have already licensed
three-dimensional data for all the new properties, and, except for the High
Island data, we are merging the data with the Cote Blanche Island data for
reprocessing into a second integrated geophysical and geological database.
This second database then will guide our drilling in all the represented
properties as the first database is doing in Lake Washington and Bay de
Chene. As noted earlier, our ultimate goal is to develop a comprehensive
geophysical and geological database in South Louisiana over most of the area
from Plaquemines Parish to Cameron Parish. With our most recent
acquisitions, we now have 4,000 square miles of seismic data to include in
the comprehensive database. Meanwhile, as work on this effort continues, our
operations in these five fields will be ongoing and will include up to four
development wells in 2007. SOUTH TEXAS REGION South Texas is our oldest region of operation and
currently consists almost entirely of our long-time interests in the AWP
Olmos Field in McMullen County, Texas. In December 2006 we sold our
interests in an area southeast of McMullen County referred to as Garcia
Ranch. We still have small interests in a prospective area northeast of AWP.
AWP OLMOS AWP wells produce from the field’s tight Olmos sand, a
depletion-driven reservoir of low porosity and very low permeability located
at depths of approximately 9,000 feet to 11,500 feet. Production from the
sand is possible only when the sand around the bore hole is hydraulically
fractured to provide pathways into the hole and is frequently improved with
successive fractures separated in time, the later fractures reaching greater
distances as the reservoir pressure declines. Over the years we have greatly
improved the fracturing techniques we use and reduced their costs. We
performed fractures on 26 wells in the area during 2006 and plan to carry
out 18 fractures in 2007. In another production enhancement technique, we routinely
install small-diameter coiled tubing in the well bores during the completion
process, thereby restricting the cross section of the upward gas flow to
increase its velocity and prevent "liquid loading" of the wells by droplets
of condensate in the flow stream dropping back into the wells. In selected
cases, we also replace pumping units with a plunger lift mechanism that both
increases production and reduces costs. We have also effected cost
reductions in the field by adopting slim-hole drilling techniques,
monitoring production remotely, and implementing other improvements. During 2006 we completed 14 of 15 development wells drilled to the AWP
Olmos sand, but were unsuccessful with five exploratory wells drilled to a
shallow horizon at an aggregate cost of about $0.5 million. AWP provided
10.6% of our total 2006 production and 13.1% of our domestic production. At
year-end 2006, the field held 17.9% of our total reserves, of which 69.8%
was natural gas and 32.7% was undeveloped, and had 110 proved undeveloped
drilling locations. TOLEDO BEND REGION Our third domestic region of operation consists of a
collection of properties that together are called Toledo Bend because the
initial acquisitions in 1998 were near the Toledo Bend Reservoir along the
Texas-Louisiana border. The principal fields in those acquisitions were the
Brookeland Field located in the Texas counties of Jasper and Newton and the
Masters Creek Field located in the Louisiana parishes of Vernon and Rapides,
each of which became an anchor area of operation for the company. In 2005,
we expanded this region by purchasing strategic properties in South Bearhead
Creek Field about 50 miles south of Masters Creek in Beauregard Parish. BROOKELAND / MASTERS CREEK Both the Brookeland Field and the Masters Creek Field
produce from the Austin Chalk trend in which pools of hydrocarbons,
primarily crude oil, can be found in natural vertical fractures of the
formation. In order to intercept one or more of these fractures, well bores
are turned from a vertical direction to a horizontal direction at the depth
of the trend. Upon finding the pools, the wells typically have very high
initial production rates with relatively rapid decline; i.e., the reserves
are considered short lived. In Brookeland, the reserves are depletion driven
and generally are found at depths of 7,000 feet to 14,000 feet, whereas in
Masters Creek they are water driven and usually found at depths greater than
14,000 feet. Soon after we closed the Toledo Bend acquisition we
quickly upgraded both fields and gained dramatic increases in production and
reserves. They have been major producing assets for us for more than eight
years, and at year-end 2006 they held 9.2% of our total reserves (3.6% in
Brookeland and 5.6% in Masters Creek). Approximately 63% of the reserves in Masters Creek and
Brookeland are undeveloped, primarily because in 2002 we deliberately slowed
drilling in these two fields in order to focus on the long-lived reserves in
South Louisiana and South Texas. In 2002, we drilled no wells in the Austin
Chalk, and only one well in each of the years 2003, 2004, and 2005, all
successfully. In 2006, we again drilled a single successful well—a
turnazontal well in Brookeland in which two additional horizontal legs were
added to a well already possessing two legs. We plan to drill an additional
turnazontal well in Brookeland in 2007. As a result of this deliberate
slowdown, these two areas contributed only 5.4% of our total production
during 2006. At year-end 2006, we had a total of 19 proved undeveloped
locations in the two fields. In April 2006 we sold our minority interest in a natural
gas processing plant and related infrastructure in Brookeland that served
both fields. SOUTH BEARHEAD CREEK South Bearhead Creek produces from the upper and lower
Wilcox sands at depths of 10,600 feet to 14,100 feet and from the Cockfield
sands at depths of 8,000 feet to 8,500 feet. We began our exploitation of
the field in 2006 with the completion of three development wells drilled to
the Wilcox sand. Early in 2007 we completed an additional well and spudded a
fifth well. We plan to drill up to four wells during the year. At year-end 2006, our interests in South Bearhead Creek
totaled 6,258 net acres with 19 drilling locations identified. During 2006,
the field contributed 0.9% of our total company production. NEW ZEALAND REGION Our only international region of operation is located in
the Taranaki Basin of the North Island of New Zealand. We began operations
there in mid-1999 when we drilled a discovery well on a prospect we had
identified (the Rimu prospect) after obtaining our first exploration permit
in the region in 1995. We subsequently developed the Rimu/Kauri anchor area
around this and another prospect (the Kauri prospect) drilled in 2001
approximately 5 miles south of Rimu. In 2002, we added a second anchor area,
the TAWN area, with the acquisition of four operating fields about 17 miles
to the north of the Rimu discovery. We have also drilled exploration wells
in the basin outside the anchor areas. Altogether, at year-end 2006, we had
314,360 gross acres (182,381 net acres) in New Zealand covered by petroleum
exploration permits (PEPs), petroleum mining permits (PMPs), and petroleum
mining licenses (PMLs) (see map on below).
During 2006, New Zealand contributed 19.2% of our total
company production and at year-end held 13.0% of our total reserves. RIMU/KAURI The target sands in Rimu/Kauri are the deep Tariki sands
featuring upper and lower sandstone found by the Rimu discovery well at a
depth of about 16,000 feet, the intermediate-depth Kauri sands encountered
by the Kauri discovery well at approximately 10,000 feet, and a shallow
oil-rich Manutahi sand discovered by the Kauri well at about 4,000 feet. Commercial production from the area began soon after
completion of the Rimu Production Station in 2002. After a series of
upgrades, the production station at year-end 2006 had a natural gas
processing capacity of 24 MMcf per day and an oil capacity of 8,250 barrels
per day. During 2006, we completed two of three development wells
drilled in Rimu/Kauri, one to the Kauri and Tariki sands and the other to
the Manutahi sand. We were unsuccessful with an exploratory well targeting
the Manutahi sand. Development projects in 2007 include several well
workovers. Rimu/Kauri contributed 9.0% of our total 2006 production
and at year-end held 9.4% of our total reserves. At year-end 2006, the area
had 18 proved undeveloped drilling locations identified. TAWN Infrastructure acquired with the TAWN fields included two
processing facilities, the Waihapa Oil Plant and the Tariki Ahuroa Gas
Plant, both located at the Waihapa Production Station. At year-end 2006,
these two processing facilities had a natural gas processing capacity of 42
MMcf per day and an oil capacity of 15,000 barrels per day. They are
connected to industry markets by 32-mile oil and gas pipelines. During 2006, we completed a development well drilled in
the Waihapa Field (PML 38140) to the Tikorangi formation. Two exploratory
wells, the Goss in PML 38140 and the Trapper in PML 38141, both targeting
sands within formations of the Kapuni Group, were unsuccessful. We are
considering performing a three-dimensional seismic survey in the area in the
future. TAWN contributed 10.2% of our total 2006 production, and
at year-end it held 3.6% of our total reserves with one proved undeveloped
location identified. NONCORE EXPLORATION In another area of exploration on the southern offshore
extension of the Rimu/Kauri structure trend, we conducted a
three-dimensional marine seismic survey over 152 square kilometers (59
square miles) in anticipation of drilling a prospect (the Kaheru prospect).
We have a 50% interest in this area, which is covered by PEP 38495 and
covers 402 square miles (gross).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was last updated on Monday, May 21, 2007, at 01:42:11 PM. Copyright © 1994-2008 by Swift Energy Company. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||