In recent years Swift’s operations have increasingly focused in four geographic
regions as the Company has acquired new producing properties and leaseholds
in the vicinities of its major producing properties. Recognizing this trend,
the Company in 2005 designated its core areas of operation as anchor
properties within the four regions with the expectation that new properties
added within the regions will also be developed into significant producing
properties. As the development progresses, Swift will benefit from the
economy of scale and efficient use of its operational staff, while
diversifying and enlarging its overall operations. The four geographic regions are designated as South
Louisiana, South Texas, Toledo Bend (a contiguous region that crosses the
Texas-Louisiana border), and New Zealand. In South Louisiana, the anchor
property is the Lake Washington Area in Plaquemines Parish, with newly
acquired properties expanding into other parishes. In South Texas, the
anchor property is the AWP Olmos Area in McMullen County, also with Company
interests in surrounding counties. In Toledo Bend, one anchor property is
the Brookeland Area in the Texas counties of Newton and Jasper, and another
is the Masters Creek Area in the Louisiana parishes of Rapides and Vernon.
And in New Zealand, the anchor properties are the Rimu/Kauri Area and the
TAWN Area in that country’s Taranaki Basin. During 2005, the combined production from the four
regions totaled a record 59.6 Bcfe, of which 94.4% came from the anchor
properties. While a record, this production was only 2% higher than Swift’s
2004 production and considerably lower than the 10% to 14% increase that the
Company had anticipated during the first half of the year. The change of
circumstances occurred on August 29 when Hurricane Katrina struck the Lake
Washington Area and also hit one of Swift’s newly acquired properties, the
Bay de Chene Field in Lafourche Parish and Jefferson Parish, causing damage
in both fields. Then on September 23, Hurricane Rita damaged another newly
acquired property, the Cote Blanche Island Field in St. Mary Parish. In
addition, Rita precipitated precautionary production shut-ins in Toledo
Bend. In the end, Swift’s only domestic operations left untouched by the
hurricanes were those in South Texas. Rita even caused the evacuation of
Swift’s headquarters and principal offices in Houston for several days. As a result of the storms, approximately 6 to 6.5 Bcfe
that the Company had expected to produce in 2005 was deferred. With this
deferral and a large domestic drilling program planned, the Company is now
projecting a Company-wide increase in production of 14% to 18% in 2006. Because domestic drilling activities were reduced during
the second half of 2005 and expected reserves in New Zealand did not
materialize, the Company’s reserves declined 5% to 762 Bcfe from year-end
2004 to year-end 2005. However, the 2006 drilling activities are expected to
increase reserves by 5% to 8% by year-end. As has been the case over the last three years, Swift’s
current strategy is to concentrate its domestic drilling program, both
development and exploratory, in South Louisiana, with additional development
drilling in South Texas. In addition to having large volumes of long-lived
reserves, these two regions have a high percentage of drilling successes,
and by focusing on them the Company can build a prolific long-term domestic
production base while simultaneously increasing its reserves. The two
regions also offer a balance between oil and natural gas production, with
South Louisiana’s reserves being largely oil (including natural gas liquids)
and South Texas’ reserves being mostly gas. Drilling in Toledo Bend, which
has short-lived reserves, is largely being deferred; however, this region
has a high percentage of undeveloped proved reserves that will be developed
at a measured pace to control the decline in the fields. In New Zealand,
Swift expects to complete several exploratory wells in 2006 and to continue
development drilling in its two anchor areas. Swift’s oil and gas sales in 2005 totaled a record $423.8
million, with total capital expenditures of $265 million. In 2006, capital
expenditures are expected to total $300 to $325 million, of which $175 to
$195 million will be allocated to South Louisiana, $25 to $30 million to
South Texas, $15 to $20 million to Toledo Bend, $35 to $45 million to New
Zealand, and $50 to $60 million to other projects. Discussions of the anchor properties in the Company’s
four regions of operation are presented below, with discussions of other
regional properties given in a following section (see page 16). SOUTH LOUISIANA Swift’s Lake Washington Area, the anchor area in South
Louisiana, is located in inland waters near Port Sulphur in Plaquemines
Parish, which protrudes into the Gulf of Mexico just southeast of New
Orleans and provides a pathway for the Mississippi River to exit into the
Gulf waters. When Hurricane Katrina made landfall, the eye of the storm
passed over Port Sulphur and, according to subsequent media reports, "the
Mississippi River reclaimed Plaquemines Parish."
In anticipation of Katrina, Swift had shut in all its
Lake Washington production and prepared all barge-based equipment for the
storm, moving much of it to ports. After the storm, the Company put multiple
teams into action on several fronts. It immediately sent a fixed wing
aircraft over the field for preliminary assessment of the damage, and
simultaneously began to locate and assist its affected employees and their
families, most of whom had found temporary living quarters outside the
parish (see page 20). With the returning employees forced to travel long
distances to reach the field, Swift also expanded its barge-based crew
quarters, including those in other affected fields, so that all South
Louisiana workers could follow a schedule of seven days at work and seven
days off. After initial assessments of Katrina’s damage to the Lake
Washington operations, Swift announced on September 14 that repairs and the
resumption of production in the field could require up to six weeks, and
even then it would be dependent on the reopening of third-party pipelines
for marketing production. Although some drilling had already been restarted,
10 to 15 wells planned for Lake Washington and other South Louisiana
properties were deferred from 2005 to 2006. And because its Port Sulphur
shore base had become inaccessible, a new shore base was established at
DuLac, Louisiana, some distance from the field. Approximately a week later, all operations in Lake
Washington—and in several other Swift fields—were again shut in to minimize
potential damage from Hurricane Rita, which hit the Louisiana-Texas
coastline on September 23. Damage to Lake Washington by Rita was
subsequently reported to be minimal, and on October 5, while numerous
repairs throughout the field were still under way, the Company announced
that Lake Washington’s production had been restored to approximately 80% of
the field’s pre-Katrina levels. Full production remained hampered by the
unavailability of pipeline outlets to markets. While oil could be barged
out, production levels of both oil and gas were constrained because a
third-party pipeline that handled Swift’s gas production was not operating.
In early November Swift announced that it had found an alternate outlet for
its natural gas, and in December Lake Washington production returned to near
normal levels, averaging 17,427 gross BOE per day. This was up from an
average of 15,500 gross BOE per day in December 2004 and represented a
seventeen-fold increase over its production when Swift acquired the property
in 2001. For all of 2005, Lake Washington produced 26.7 Bcfe, 44.9% of
Swift’s total production. This dramatic increase in production in Lake Washington
is due to Swift’s focused drilling and completion program and continuing
upgrades of the field’s infrastructure. Each well drilled targets oil and
gas reserves that are held in multiple stacked layers of Miocene sands that
are identified by letters of the alphabet or by the depths at which they
were first found. The sand layers radiate outward and downward from the
surface of a centrally located salt dome that has surface depths varying
from about 1,200 feet at its peak down to about 14,000 feet over most of
Swift’s acreage (17,352 net acres). The field is heavily faulted, with many
isolated fault blocks abutting the dome and others located several miles
away from the dome. Because the field is primarily water driven, any
hydrocarbons existing in one (or more) of the fault block sands are pushed
upward to the sand’s highest elevation within the fault block, that is, to
the region nearest the salt dome. Each well drilled within a fault block is
designed to intercept as many of these "pay sands" as possible, which means
that those drilled adjacent to the salt dome must be angled down the flank
of the dome. The wells are drilled and completed from barge-based
rigs. After a well is cased, the casing is eventually perforated at each pay
sand location to allow flow into the wellbore. The typical procedure is to
begin production from the lowest pay zone, with the higher zones often
sealed off by a sliding sleeve until they are opened for future production. Through 2005, Swift had encountered 74 different pay
zones in the sands and had made completions in 36 pay zones, with an average
of 142 feet of net pay per completed well. Since the Company has focused on
drilling to relatively shallow depths, most of the pay sands have been found
at depths from 1,500 to 6,000 feet, but others have been found at depths of
12,000 feet and deeper. Through 2005, Swift had drilled 152 wells in the
Lake Washington Field with a success rate of 75%—nearly all with 100% Swift
working interests. During 2005, it drilled 32 wells with a success rate of
66%. Among the 152 wells drilled to date have been 26
exploratory wells, including eight drilled in 2005 with a 63% success rate.
Of these, three were the first wells to be based on the large
three-dimensional seismic data base that Swift has assembled during the past
two years. The data base consists of the proprietary results from the
Company’s 55-square-mile survey conducted in Lake Washington during 2004,
together with three-dimensional data acquired for a 550-square-mile area
northwest of Lake Washington and three-dimensional data associated with the
Company’s newly acquired Bay de Chene Field (see page 16). The first of the three seismic-based exploration wells,
all highly successful, was located on the northwest flank of the field’s
salt dome and was identified as the SL 212#169 on the Newport prospect. At a
depth of 10,418 feet it found 44 feet of pay in a sand section that was new
to Swift and will be identified in a nomenclature specific to the prospect.
Drilled in the second quarter of the year, this well was placed in
production in 2005 and in December tested at 1,823 barrels of oil and 1.32
MMcf of gas per day. The second well was a Newport delineation well (the SL
17990#3). Drilled in the fourth quarter of 2005 to a depth of 12,736 feet
and 700 feet downdip to the west of the initial discovery, it found 283 feet
of total net pay: 36 feet at a depth of 10,470 feet in the 9,600-foot sand,
and 136 feet at a depth of 11,546 feet and 111 feet at a depth of 12,190
feet in the same sand section found by the original Newport well. The second
zone tested at 3,637 barrels of oil and 2.8 MMcf of gas per day, and the
lowest zone tested at 3,792 barrels of oil and 2.7 MMcf of gas per day. The third well (the SL 18148#1), also a fourth-quarter
well, was drilled on the Bondi prospect 5 miles northwest of the salt dome
to a depth of 13,649 feet. At a depth of 12,657 feet it found 21 feet of net
pay and at a depth of 12,704 feet it found 16 feet of net pay, both in the
same sand section found in the Newport wells. The upper zone tested at 1,723
barrels of oil and 1.1 MMcf of gas per day and the lower zone tested at
1,560 barrels of oil and 0.7 MMcf of gas per day.
With the late drilling dates of the second and third
wells, neither contributed to Lake Washington’s 2005 production. Nor was
there time to sufficiently evaluate their discovered reserves for them to be
fully included in the Company’s 2005 year-end reserves. The Newport
delineation well is expected to be in production in the first half of 2006,
with the Bondi well following once pipeline connections can be made to its
more distant location. In the meantime, several additional Newport
delineation wells will be drilled to help define the size and volumes of
that reservoir. As is typical of most Lake Washington wells, these new
discoveries are expected to be strong contributors to Swift’s production
over several years. For example, a 2002 well, the CM-187 that discovered a
productive F sand, had a cumulative production of 1,048,056 barrels of oil
and 196.2 MMcf of gas at year-end 2005. Over the same period, another 2002
well, the SL 212 #104 that discovered the 8,400-foot sand, had a cumulative
production of 821,812 barrels of oil and 666.5 MMcf of gas. In addition to a well-executed drilling program, Lake
Washington’s production has increasingly benefited from an on-going
infrastructure upgrade program that over the last three years has expanded
the decks of the field’s three production processing platforms and added
needed equipment. Scheduled to be completed by mid-2005, final installations
were delayed by Hurricane Katrina but were effectively completed in January
2006. As a result, the field now has an oil processing capacity of
approximately 28,000 barrels per day. All the separated oil is sent to the
field’s Oil Delivery System (ODS) constructed adjacent to the SL-212
platform. From the ODS the oil is marketed by barge or via an
8-inch-diameter pipeline that ties into a large commercial pipeline. The separated gas is sent to compressors at each platform
and then routed to a newly installed 6-inch-diameter high-pressure pipeline
that carries the gas into the field for gas lift or to a connecting
commercial gas pipeline. Post the upgrade, the field’s gas compression
capacity (as of mid-January 2006) is 44 MMcf per day, of which 10 to 12 MMcf
per day is marketed. Because of its Lake Washington operations, Swift Energy
is the largest crude oil producer and most active driller in Louisiana. As
the field’s production operations expand even further, new facilities will
be constructed, beginning with those required to handle the production from
the 2005 discovery wells and others to be drilled. With its rapid recovery
from the hurricane damage and its backlog of wells to be drilled in Lake
Washington and other areas in the South Louisiana Region, Swift is
predicting a Company-wide production increase of 14% to 18% in 2006. At
year-end 2005, the field’s already proven reserves (excluding the
unevaluated reserves from the latest discoveries) were estimated to be 238.9
Bcfe, of which 41.4% is still undeveloped. Two drilling rigs will remain in
the field throughout 2006, one drilling up to 23 development wells at depths
ranging between 1,650 and 9,000 feet and the other drilling up to nine
exploratory and development wells at depths between 9,800 and 14,000 feet.
In support of the drilling program, especially for the deeper wells, Swift
will continue its detailed analyses of its three-dimensional seismic data
base and its correlation with available geological information. As reported
earlier, Swift believes that its deeper exploration will likely encounter
more high-pressure gas, adding even more diversity to the Company’s overall
production portfolio. SOUTH TEXAS The AWP Olmos Area in McMullen County, Texas, is Swift’s
second largest and longest operating area and the anchor property for the
Company’s South Texas Region. Since 1989 when Swift began operating 65
producing wells on a 4,900-acre AWP lease, the area has expanded to 526
producing wells on 29,226 net acres, including new acreage added in 2005.
The field produces from the Olmos sands at depths of approximately 10,000
feet and is 67% natural gas. At year-end 2005, it held 22.8% of the
Company’s total proven reserves and 26.95% of its domestic proven reserves.
Approximately 36% of the area’s reserves remain undeveloped. In operating AWP, Swift’s strategy has been to improve
efficiency and minimize costs while maximizing the field’s production level
and minimizing the effects of natural production declines. While focusing on
building production levels in the field, the Company has drilled as many as
142 development wells in one year (1997) with a 95.2% success rate, most
with 100% Swift working interests. Since 2003, it has drilled 41 wells in
the area with a 95.1% success rate, including 18 completions out of 18 wells
drilled in 2005, all with 100% working interests.
Swift’s AWP operations continue to couple the latest in
advanced stimulation technology with opportunities for further associated
cost reductions. In 2005, fracture treatments were successfully performed on
24 wells at an average cost of $123,000, a 28% reduction from the previous
year. The savings for these treatments, which fracture the tight sand around
each well to create pathways for hydrocarbon flow into the well, was
achieved through fluid and proppant optimization and batch scheduling of all
down-hole work. This type of stimulation has been shown to be equally as
effective in productivity as the previous treatments and fits well into the
proven routine of performing second and third fractures on older wells to
enhance their later life production. There are ten of these type fracture
stimulations planned for 2006. During 2005, AWP provided 12.9% of Swift’s total
production and 17.9% of its domestic production, and with the lives of the
wells typically being 15 years or more, the field is expected to continue as
a consistent producer. During 2006, the Company plans to drill 10 to 15 AWP
development wells. TOLEDO BEND Swift’s Toledo Bend, a contiguous region that spans
across the Texas-Louisiana border, includes two anchor areas that were
acquired together in mid-1998: the Masters Creek Area located in the
Louisiana parishes of Rapides and Vernon; and the Brookeland Area located in
the Texas counties of Newton and Jasper. Both fields produce from the Austin
Chalk trend in which pools of hydrocarbons can be found in natural vertical
fractures of the formation. To reach the pools, the bore hole is first
drilled vertically down to the formation and then laterally outward to
intercept one or more vertical fractures from a perpendicular direction.
Frequently two lateral legs are drilled from the same vertical hole in
opposite directions. Austin Chalk reserves are short-lived, with successful
wells typically having high initial production and then declining to a lower
production rate. The two anchor areas differ in that the Brookeland Field
is depletion driven while the Masters Creek Field is water driven. From 1998
through 2001, Swift drilled numerous wells in both areas, but with the
Company’s drilling emphasis on long-lived reserves beginning in 2002,
further Toledo Bend drilling has been largely deferred. During 2005, Swift
participated with a 50% working interest in a successful development well
drilled in Newton County by another operator. In 2006, the Company plans to drill two "turnazontal"
wells in the Brookeland Area. Both wells will be reentries into previously
drilled development wells to add two lateral legs that will intercept the
fractures at points distant from the original entry. This is accomplished by
drilling the additional legs approximately perpendicular to the original
legs and then turning them to be parallel to the original legs. The
additional legs can be drilled at a little over one-half the cost of the
original well with its two laterals. At year-end 2005, proved reserves in the two anchor areas totaled 90.8
Bcfe (12% of the Company’s total reserves), of which 55.4% remains
undeveloped. The reserves are 63% oil and during 2005 provided 8.9% of
Swift’s total production. Production was constrained from both areas for a
period following Hurricane Rita due to the lack of power for transportation
and processing of both crude oil and natural gas.
NEW ZEALAND
Swift’s fourth region of operation is in New Zealand,
where the Company continues as the country’s most active driller, a position
it has held since 2003. The region has two anchor areas on the north
island’s Taranaki Basin: the Rimu/Kauri Area and the TAWN Area. Located 17
miles apart, the two properties jointly supply approximately 9% of New
Zealand’s natural gas production and approximately 7% of its oil production. Swift’s New Zealand production in 2005 was 16.5 Bcfe, up
2% from 2004 due to an increase in Rimu/Kauri’s natural gas production
offsetting TAWN’s natural decline. The region’s production accounted for 28%
of the Company’s total 2005 production, 14% from each area. Swift’s New Zealand proved reserves at year-end 2005
totaled 117.8 Bcfe, a decrease of 20% from year-end 2004. The principal
reason for the decline was that Swift’s 2005 drilling program focused on
development drilling that resulted in a downward revision of the Kauri sand
reserves in the Rimu/Kauri area. New Zealand reserves, which were 53%
natural gas and 64% undeveloped, comprised 15.5% of the Company’s total
year-end proved reserves, 10.8% in the Rimu/Kauri Area and 4.6% in the TAWN
Area. TAWN Area. In 2005, Swift drilled a successful discovery well, the
Piakau North A-1, in TAWN with a 100% working interest. Drilled to a total
vertical depth of 9,623 feet, the well encountered 72 feet of net pay in the
Eocene-aged McKee sand. It was limited to test rates of 7 million cubic feet
of gas with 400 barrels of condensate per day to meet the pipeline
specifications for natural gas flowing directly into the production lines of
the TAWN facilities. Following testing, the well was shut in for part of the
fourth quarter while a delineation well was drilled nearby. The delineation well, the Piakau North A-2, encountered
an oil/water contact and was unable to produce commercially. It was followed
by an unsuccessful exploratory well, the Ahuroa South B-1, drilled
approximately 1½ miles north of the Piakau North A-1 well. Following the
drilling of these two wells, both of which targeted the Eocene-aged McKee
sand, Swift determined that the initial Piakau North A-1 discovery well is
compartmentalized. Two exploratory prospects, the Goss A-1 in PML 38140 and
the Trapper A-1 in PML 38141, are being drilled in early 2006 under Swift’s
Tarata Thrust Exploratory Drilling Program, which is part of the Company’s
joint venture with Mighty River Power Ltd. (MRP), a government-owned utility
that provides approximately 20% of New Zealand’s total electricity demand.
The wells are targeting sands within the McKee, Mangahewa, and Kaimiro
formations of the Kapuni Group, with the Tariki sands being a secondary
target. Swift is the operator of both wells, with MRP earning a 50% working
interest in any new commercial discoveries resulting from these prospects in
return for providing the funding for the wells. Subject to the terms of the
agreements, Swift and the utility will share equally in any development
costs resulting from these wells. Swift plans to drill two development wells in the TAWN
Area in 2006 that will target the Tikorangi formation in PML 38140. In
addition, a 49-mile two-dimensional seismic survey is planned in PML 38138
and PML 38139. Swift’s processing infrastructure in the TAWN Area has
significant excess capacity for adding production from any new wells that
come on line. The TAWN facilities have a 60 MMcf per day capacity for
natural gas and a 15,000 barrel per day capacity for oil production, and are
connected to industry markets by a 32-mile oil pipeline and a 32-mile gas
pipeline. Rimu/Kauri Area. The area around the Rimu-A1 is covered by the petroleum
mining permit 38151 awarded to Swift in 2002, and the area around the
Kauri-A1 is covered by a second permit, PMP 38155, awarded in 2005 and
covering 8,708 acres for a primary term of 30 years. Kauri gas production
from the permit area is processed at the Company’s Rimu Production Station,
and the Manutahi oil production is initially being trucked to the Company’s
Waihapa Production Station. The Kauri sands were the main target of Swift’s
development drilling in the area in 2005. Three wells encountered the
targeted sand but two were deemed non-commercial due to poor sand quality.
The one successful well was the Kauri-E9, which was drilled to a depth of
approximately 10,700 feet and was fracture stimulated during the second
quarter of 2005 along with the Kauri-E7 well drilled in 2004. Three older wells had second fracture stimulations
performed in 2005: the Kauri-A4, the Kauri-E2, and the Kauri-E1. The
resulting production rates of the Kauri-A4 and Kauri-E2 returned to near
their peak rates immediately following their original fracture stimulations.
The Kauri-E1, which has never produced commercially, again failed to
establish commercial production. Other efforts to increase the deliverability and ultimate
recovery from the Kauri sands included the installation of a low-pressure
compressor near the site of the Kauri-A1 discovery well that will service
several wells producing from the Kauri sands. A successful development well drilled to the Manutahi
sand in 2005, the Kauri-F2 in PMP 38155, was the first of Swift’s wells to
be completed using an expandable screen to stabilize the formation. Another
technique Swift is implementing to control sand production in this area is a
fracture-pack stimulation, which was used in 2005 to restore oil production
in two Manutahi wells. In early 2006, a shallow exploratory well targeting the
Manutahi sand in PMP 38151, the Pohutukawa-A1, was plugged and abandoned
when it was found that the target formation contained too much water for the
well to be commercial. Seismic data obtained in 2005 from a two-dimensional
transitional zone survey covering 112 linear kilometers is being used to
site potential locations for future wells. Swift’s development drilling program in 2006 includes
three wells in the Rimu/Kauri Area, all in PMP 38155. The Kauri-F3, drilled
early in the year, successfully intersected the Manutahi sand and was
completed using an expandable screen to stabilize the formation. The
Kauri-E11 targeting the Tariki sand and the Kauri sands began drilling in
February, with the Kauri-E12, also targeting the Kauri sands, to follow. The
locations of both the Kauri-E11 and -E12 were selected based on an analysis
of data from the two-dimensional transitional zone survey. After upgrading the natural gas processing capacity of
the Rimu Production Station to 20 MMcf/day at year-end 2004, Swift further
increased its capacity by 20% in 2005 to 24 MMcf/day. The Company
accomplished this by implementing a low-cost project that eliminated a
bottleneck in the compression. Another 2005 enhancement was the installation
of a new heat exchanger, which increased recovery of liquefied petroleum gas
(LPG) by chilling the inlet gas stream to a lower temperature. The
facility’s oil processing capacity is 7,500 barrels per day. Distribution of Swift Energy's Proved
Reserves
Proved Reservesa (Bcfe) aSee
definitions of proved reserves, proved developed reserves, and proved undeveloped reserves
on page 79.
Distribution of Wells in Which Swift Owned Interests
aSwift is the operator of
898 producing wells and 37 service wells. The Company has interests in 967
producing wells and 49 service wells.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was last updated on Wednesday, March 22, 2006, at 10:48:56 AM. Copyright © 1994-2008 by Swift Energy Company. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||