SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY 2001 ANNUAL REPORT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties See pages 59 and 60 for explanations of abbreviations and terms used herein. General Swift Energy Company is engaged in developing, exploring, acquiring, and operating oil and gas properties, with a focus on onshore oil and natural gas reserves in Texas and Louisiana and onshore oil and natural gas reserves in New Zealand. The Company was founded in 1979 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. As of December 31, 2001, we had interests in 1,235 wells located domestically in five states, in federal offshore waters, and in New Zealand. We operated 854 of these wells representing 95% our proved reserves. At year-end 2001, we had estimated proved reserves of 645.8 Bcfe, of which approximately 50% was natural gas and 50% was proved developed. Our proved reserves are concentrated 53% in Texas, 28% in Louisiana, and 16% in New Zealand. We currently focus primarily on development and exploration in four domestic core areas and in New Zealand:
The AWP Olmos and Lake Washington areas and New Zealand are characterized by long-lived reserves that we expect to be steadily produced over a long period of time. The Brookeland and Masters Creek areas are characterized by shorter-lived reserves with high initial rates of production that decline rapidly. We believe these shorter-lived reserves complement our long-lived reserves. We focus on drilling the long-lived properties during periods of decreasing commodity prices, while the shorter-lived properties provide additional drillable projects in periods of rising commodity prices. Based on 2001 year-end domestic proved reserves and 2001 domestic production, our average domestic reserve life was 12.3 years. Based on a report by an independent engineering firm, prepared as part of the mining license application process, the Rimu/Kauri development area is estimated to have a 25-30 year economic life. We purchased interests in the Brookeland and Masters Creek areas from Sonat Exploration Company in the third quarter of 1998 for approximately $85.8 million in cash. Of this purchase price, $55.5 million was spent for producing properties, $15.0 million for 20% interests in two natural gas processing plants, and $15.3 million for leasehold properties. This acquisition generated two new core areas. Then in late December 1999, we purchased additional working interests in the Masters Creek area from Dominion Reserves, Inc., for approximately $14.0 million in cash and purchased additional working interests in the S. Burr Ferry portion of the Masters Creek area from Union Pacific for approximately $1.9 million. We expect to use our operating expertise in this geological trend to continue to successfully develop and exploit these properties. In the first quarter of 2001, we purchased interests in the Lake Washington field from Elysium Energy, LLC, for approximately $30.5 million in cash. This acquisition created the newest core area for the Company. Our strategy is to increase our reserves and production through both drilling and acquisitions, shifting the balance between the two activities in response to market conditions. In addition, we seek to enhance the results of our drilling and production efforts through the implementation of advanced technologies. For 1999, in response to lower oil and gas prices in 1998 that continued in the first half of 1999, we decreased our capital expenditures budget to $54.2 million, of which $36.0 million was targeted for drilling, $31.3 million for development drilling, and $4.7 million for exploratory drilling. The remaining $18.2 million was targeted principally for leasehold, seismic, and geological costs of prospects. After oil and gas prices rebounded in the second half of the year, we increased our capital expenditures during the fourth quarter. We funded the $78.1 million of capital expenditures spent in 1999 primarily through our internally generated cash flows of $73.6 million, while the remainder was funded with net proceeds from our third quarter 1999 public offering of common stock and Senior Notes that remained after paying off our bank debt. For 2000, in response to the strengthening of oil and gas prices and the resulting increase in cash flows generated from these commodity prices, we increased our capital expenditures to $173.3 million, of which $105.8 million was targeted for drilling in the United States, with $90.3 million for development drilling and $15.5 million for exploratory drilling. We spent $9.7 million in drilling to further delineate our Rimu discovery in New Zealand. Additionally, $33.4 million was spent for producing property acquisitions. The remaining $24.4 million was used principally for leasehold, seismic, and geological costs of prospects. We funded the $173.3 million of capital expenditures in 2000 primarily through our internally generated cash flows of $128.2 million, while the remainder was funded with net proceeds from our third quarter 1999 public offering of common stock and Senior Notes that remained after paying off our bank debt and funding capital expenditures in 1999. During 2001, as oil and gas prices continued to rise early in the year and stayed strong through the first half of the year, our cash flow generated due to these commodity prices increased as well. As a result of this cash flow and our continued efforts in New Zealand, along with the opportunity to acquire the Lake Washington assets, we increased our capital expenditures to $275.1 million. Of this amount, $157.0 million was spent on drilling in the United States, with $120.6 million for development drilling and $36.4 million for exploratory drilling. We spent $26.2 million on drilling in New Zealand, with $19.0 million on development drilling and $7.2 million on exploratory drilling. We also spent $17.9 million constructing a gas processing plant in New Zealand and $40.5 million for domestic producing property acquisitions, primarily for the Lake Washington acquisition. The remaining $33.5 million was spent primarily on leasehold, seismic and geological costs of prospects, both in the United States and New Zealand. During 2001, we relied upon internally generated cash flows of $139.9 million to partially fund our capital expenditures; the remainder was funded with increases in borrowings under our bank credit facility. Due to falling oil and gas prices in the second half of 2001 and continuing into 2002, we have again reduced our 2002 capital expenditures budget and intend on focusing on low risk development drilling on long-lived reserve properties. Therefore, our 2002 drilling will focus in Lake Washington and on developing our Rimu and Kauri areas in New Zealand. We anticipate spending approximately $132.5 million in 2002 for capital expenditures, with approximately $50.9 million of this amount for drilling activity. The TAWN acquisition, which closed in January 2002, accounted for $54.4 million of this budget. This $132.5 million budget also excludes any property acquisition that may present itself in this low price environment and also excludes any property sales. We have increased our proved reserves from 258.7 Bcfe at year-end 1996 to 645.8 Bcfe at year-end 2001, which has resulted in the replacement of 302% of our production during the same five-year period. In 2001, we increased our proved reserves by 3%, which replaced 136% of our 2001 production. Our five-year average reserves replacement costs were $1.26 per Mcfe. Our 2001 production increased by 6% in relation to 2000 production. We have increased our production from 19.4 Bcfe at year-end 1996 to 44.8 Bcfe at year-end 2001. Primarily due to increased production, along with strong 2001 commodity prices, this has resulted in average annual growth in net cash provided by operating activities of 30% per year from year-end 1996 to year-end 2001. Domestic Properties AWP Olmos Area. As of December 31, 2001, we owned approximately 28,562 net acres in the AWP Olmos area. We have extensive expertise and a long history of experience with low-permeability, tight-sand formations typical of this area, having acquired our first acreage there in 1988. These reserves are approximately 74% gas. At year-end 2001, we owned interests in 496 wells and were the operator of 492 wells in this area producing gas from the Olmos sand formation at a depth of approximately 10,000 to 11,500 feet. We own nearly 100% of the working interests in all wells in which we are the operator. In 2001, we drilled 11 development wells in the AWP Olmos area, all of which were successful. At year-end 2001, we had 122 proved undeveloped locations. Also in 2001, we purchased interests in the AWP Olmos area from partnerships we manage. Our planned 2002 capital expenditures in this area will focus on performing fracture extensions and installing coiled tubing velocity strings. Brookeland Area. As of December 31, 2001, we owned drilling and production rights in 127,703 gross acres (79,874 net acres) and 15,000 fee mineral acres in this area, which contains substantial proved undeveloped reserves. This area was part of the acquisition from Sonat in 1998 and is located in East Texas near the border of Louisiana in Jasper and Newton counties. It primarily contains horizontal wells producing from the Austin Chalk formation. The reserves are approximately 60% oil and natural gas liquids. In 2001, we drilled or participated in the drilling of 11 development wells there, all of which were successful. At year-end 2001, we had 17 proved undeveloped locations in this area. Lake Washington Field. As of December 31, 2001, we owned drilling and production rights in 13,595 net acres in the Lake Washington field. This area is located in Plaquemines Parish in South Louisiana. The reserves are approximately 95% oil and natural gas liquids. We acquired interests in the Lake Washington field in March 2001. This field produces oil from multiple Miocene sands ranging in depth from less than 2,000 feet to greater than 10,000 feet. The field is located on a salt dome and has produced over 300 million BOE since its inception. The area around the dome is heavily faulted, thereby creating a large number of potential traps. Oil and gas from approximately 25 producing wells is gathered from four platforms located in water depths from 6 to 11 feet, with drilling and workover operations performed with barge rigs. In 2001, four development wells and one exploratory well were drilled in the area, all of which were successful. At year-end 2001, we had 29 proved undeveloped locations in this field. Our planned 2002 capital expenditures in this area are approximately $25.0 million and include 20 development wells and two exploratory wells. Masters Creek Area. As of December 31, 2001, we owned drilling and production rights in 194,212 gross acres (149,400 net acres) and 141,000 fee mineral acres in this area, which contains substantial proved undeveloped reserves. This area was also part of the acquisition from Sonat in 1998. It is located in Central Louisiana near the Texas-Louisiana border in the two parishes of Vernon and Rapides. It contains horizontal wells producing both oil and gas from the Austin Chalk formation. The reserves are approximately 74% oil and natural gas liquids. In 2001, we drilled nine development wells in the area, all of which were successful. At year-end 2001, we had 18 proved undeveloped locations in the area. Exploration and Development Drilling Activities We pursue a "controlled risk" approach to exploratory and development drilling, focusing our domestic activities on specific regions in which our technical staff has considerable experience and which are located close to known producing horizons. In our foreign operations, we chose New Zealand based on its hydrocarbon potential combined with its political and economic attributes. We seek to minimize our exploration risk by investing in multiple prospects, farming out interests to third parties, using advanced technologies, and drilling in diverse types of geological formations, often in areas with multiple objectives. We use basin studies to analyze targeted formations based on their potential size, risk profile, and economic characteristics. In 1991, we began an intensive effort to develop an inventory of exploration and development drilling prospects, identifying drilling locations through integrated geological and geophysical studies of our undeveloped acreage and other prospects. As a result, we added 64.9 Bcfe of proved reserves through drilling in 1999, 184.7 Bcfe in 2000 (122.5 Bcfe from New Zealand), and 105.8 Bcfe in 2001 (17.4 Bcfe from New Zealand). The 2001 additions were a result of our development success rate, as 38 of 40 development wells drilled were successful, while 6 of 13 exploratory wells were successful. Our development strategy is designed to maximize the value and productivity of our existing properties through development drilling and recovery methods, enhancing production results through improved field production techniques, lowering production costs, and applying our technical expertise and resources to exploit producing properties efficiently. We utilize various recovery techniques, which include employing water flooding and acid treatments, fracturing reservoir rock through the injection of high-pressure fluid, and inserting coiled tubing velocity strings to enhance and maintain gas flow. We believe that the application of fracturing technology and coiled tubing over the years has resulted in significant increases in production and decreases in completion and operating costs, particularly in our AWP Olmos area. In 2001, however, as the exploration and production industry rushed to get new projects into production to take advantage of the commodity prices in the first half of the year, service sector capacity was constrained and the costs of services skyrocketed. This, along with increased severance and ad-valorem taxes, caused our production costs to increase in 2001. Our exploration and development activities are conducted by our staff of professionals, including reservoir engineers, geologists, geophysicists, petrophysicists, landmen, and drilling and production engineers. We believe that one of the keys to our success has been our team approach, which integrates multiple disciplines to maximize efficient utilization of information leading to drillable projects. We have increasingly used advanced seismic technology to enhance the results of our drilling and production efforts, including 2-D and 3-D seismic analysis, amplitude versus offset studies, and detailed formation depletion studies. We have a number of computer workstations from which seismic data is analyzed and enhanced with advanced software programs, including Landmark, Geographix, and SMT workstations. As a result, we have maintained internal seismic expertise and have compiled an extensive database. During 1997, we completed our first international seismic acquisition program in two key areas in New Zealand. In the Rimu prospect, we acquired 30 kilometers (18.7 miles) of 2-D cross-swath data, as well as 14.5 kilometers (9 miles) of 2-D line data in the Tawa prospect, complementing existing 2-D seismic coverage. Following our 1999 Rimu discovery, we conducted a second seismic acquisition in March 2000 in which we obtained 42 kilometers (26 miles) of 2-D lines to more fully identify the extent of the Rimu structure. We also obtained approximately 72.5 kilometers (45 miles) of data from a number of 2-D transitional zone seismic lines tied to existing marine and land seismic grids in order to study the Kauri structure to the southeast of Rimu. During 2001, we acquired approximately 30 kilometers (18.7 miles) of 2-D line data in PEP 38730, in which we own a 100% working interest. Further processing and analysis of the data will continue in 2002. Also in 1997, we acquired 21 miles of 2-D data in the AWP Olmos area in south Texas and 51 miles of data in the Fayette County portion of the Giddings area. Two more prospects in the North Louisiana Salt Basin were shot in the form of 2-D swaths of approximately 16 miles each. During 1998, we performed two additional 2-D acquisitions in Fayette County, Texas. In all our current and future projects, we have an on-going program in which we license existing seismic data for reprocessing with available new technologies. In certain areas we also complement existing data with proprietary seismic data designed for specific geologic targets. This results in an integrated approach to exploration (multidiscipline data analysis and interpretation) that helped identify a number of our exploration prospects for 2001. In addition to operation, development and exploration activities in the AWP Olmos, Brookeland, Lake Washington and Masters Creek areas, we are currently pursuing development and exploration activities in the following emerging growth areas and in New Zealand. The Frio Trend. Swift Energy has been focusing on the deep sands of the Frio formation (10,000 to 16,000 feet) in an area that straddles the border of Kenedy County and Willacy County in the southern tip of Texas and is identified as Garcia Ranch. Retaining a 65% working interest, Swift had two discoveries in the area in 2001, one in the Rome prospect in Willacy County at a depth of 16,388 feet, and the other in the Siena prospect in Kenedy County at a depth of 16,300 feet. The Wilcox Sands. The Company had three discoveries in the Wilcox sands during 2001, two of which were located in Goliad County, Texas: the Nita prospect drilled to a depth of approximately 15,000 feet and the Brandon prospect drilled to a depth of about 13,000 feet. Swift’s working interests in the two wells are 73% and 60%, respectively. The third well, in which the Company has a 25% working interest, was in the Falcon Ridge prospect in Zapata County, Texas. The Woodbine Formation. Swift drilled one well to the Woodbine formation during 2001—in the Lion prospect in San Jacinto County, Texas, down to a depth of 16,300 feet. Although hydrocarbon-bearing intervals were found, the well was determined to be noncommercial. The Miocene Sands. Swift successfully drilled its first exploratory well in the Miocene sands in its new Lake Washington area in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana—to a depth of 3,348 feet with a retained interest of 100%. This area has substantial exploration and development potential, with sands extending from shallow depths down to 10,000 feet or more. Current plans are to drill another exploratory well in the area during 2002. Also in Plaquemines Parish, about 50 miles north of the Lake Washington area, is the Delacroix area where the Company has also been developing prospects for both shallow and deep horizons in the Miocene sands. The first well in this area, in the Grand Lake prospect, was drilled to a depth of 18,571 feet early in 2002 and was temporarily abandoned for a possible future sidetrack well. New Zealand. We operate permit 38719 with a 90% working interest. After working several years and analyzing extensive seismic data, we commenced drilling a successful exploratory well, the Rimu-A1, in July 1999. In 2000, we drilled two successful Rimu development wells. Our permit contains 50,300 gross acres, including 12,800 adjacent offshore acres. In 2001, we drilled three development wells to further delineate our Rimu area, one of which was successful. We also drilled two exploratory wells in the Kauri area, one still being evaluated and the other one unsuccessful. In addition, we drilled one successful development well in our Kauri area and participated in a non-operated exploratory well in another permit area that was temporarily abandoned in 2001. The Tawa prospect is located northwest of the Rimu and Kauri areas in the same permit. Its main targets are the Tikorangi limestone, the Kauri sandstone, and the Tariki sandstone. Consisting of a combination of structural and stratigraphic traps, this prospect was developed based upon Swift’s analysis of existing three-dimensional seismic data plus two-dimensional seismic data acquired during Company surveys in 1997 and 2000. The Matai prospect, located on the southeast flank of the Tawa prospect also in permit 37819, will target the Moki sandstone. It was identified based upon the analysis of the two-dimensional seismic data Swift acquired in 2000. The following table sets forth the results of our drilling activities during the three years ended December 31, 2001:
Operations We generally seek to be operator in the wells in which we have a significant economic interest. As operator, we design and manage the development of a well and supervise operation and maintenance activities on a day-to-day basis. We do not own drilling rigs or other oil field services equipment used for drilling or maintaining wells on properties we operate. Independent contractors supervised by us provide all the equipment and personnel. We employ drilling, production, and reservoir engineers, geologists, and other specialists who work to improve production rates, increase reserves, and lower the cost of operating our oil and gas properties. Oil and gas properties are customarily operated under the terms of a joint operating agreement. These agreements usually provide for reimbursement of the operator’s direct expenses and for payment of monthly per-well supervision fees. Supervision fees vary widely depending on the geographic location and depth of the well and whether the well produces oil or gas. The fees for these activities paid to us in 2001 ranged from $200 to $2,216 per well per month and totaled $6.2 million. Marketing of Production We typically sell our oil and gas production at market prices near the wellhead, although in some cases it must be gathered and delivered to a central point. Gas production is sold in the spot market on a monthly basis, while we sell our oil production at prevailing market prices. We do not refine any oil we produce. Two oil or gas purchasers accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2001, with those purchasers accounting for approximately 29% of revenues in the aggregate. For the year ended December 31, 2000, two purchasers accounted for approximately 37% of our total revenues. However, due to the availability of other purchasers, we do not believe that the loss of any single oil or gas purchaser or contract would materially affect our revenues. In 1998, we entered into gas processing and gas transportation agreements for our gas production in the AWP Olmos area with PG&E Energy Trading Corporation, which was assumed in December 2000 by El Paso Hydrocarbon, LP, and El Paso Industrial, LP, both affiliates of El Paso Merchant Energy, for up to 75,000 Mcf per day, which provided for a ten-year term with automatic one-year extensions unless earlier terminated. We believe that these arrangements adequately provide for our gas transportation and processing needs in the AWP Olmos area for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the gas processed and transported under these agreements may be sold to El Paso based upon current natural gas prices. Our oil production from the Brookeland and Masters Creek areas is sold to various purchasers at prevailing market prices. Our gas production from these areas is processed under long-term gas processing contracts with Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. The processed liquids and residue gas production are sold in the spot market at prevailing prices. Our oil production from the Lake Washington area is delivered into ExxonMobil’s crude oil pipeline system for sales to various purchasers at prevailing market prices. Our gas production from this area is either consumed on the lease or is delivered into El Paso’s Tennessee Gas Pipeline system and then sold in the spot market at prevailing prices. Our oil production in New Zealand is sold into the international market at prices tied to the Asia Petroleum Price Index Tapis posting, less the cost of storage, trucking, and transportation. Our gas production from our TAWN fields, which we acquired and closed on in January 2002, is sold under a long-term contract with Contact Energy. Upon commissioning of the Rimu Production Station, our gas production from the Rimu field will be sold to Genesis Power Ltd. under a long-term contract. Swift natural gas liquids production from the TAWN fields is sold to RockGas under long-term contracts tied to New Zealand’s domestic natural gas liquids market. Upon commissioning of the Rimu Production Station, our natural gas liquids from the Rimu Field also will be sold to RockGas. The following table summarizes sales volumes, sales prices, and production cost information for our net oil and gas production for the three-year period ended December 31, 2001. "Net" production is production that is owned by us either directly or indirectly through partnerships or joint venture interests and is produced to our interest after deducting royalty, limited partner, and other similar interests.
Acquisition Activities We use a disciplined, market-driven approach to acquisitions. Generally we seek to acquire properties with the potential for additional reserves and production through development and exploration efforts. In 142 transactions from 1979 to 2001, we have acquired approximately $631.5 million of producing oil and gas properties on behalf of ourselves and our co-investors. We acquired, for our own account, approximately $275.0 million of producing properties, with original proved reserves estimated at 394.3 Bcfe. Our producing property acquisition expenditures in the past three years were $41.3 million in 2001, $34.2 million in 2000, and $18.5 million in 1999. Our acquisition costs have averaged $0.82 per Mcfe over this three-year period. Our acquisition cost in 2001 averaged $0.76 per Mcfe. During 2002, we intend to actively look for acquisition opportunities in this environment of lower commodity prices. Foreign Activities New Zealand Swift Operated Permits. Our activity in New Zealand began in 1995 with the issuance of the first of two petroleum exploration permits. After surrendering a portion of our permit acreage in 1998, combining the two permits and expanding the permit acreage in 1999, and relinquishing 50% of the acreage in 2001 as we extended our petroleum exploration permit, our permit 38719 as of year-end 2001 covered approximately 50,300 acres in the Taranaki Basin of New Zealand’s north island, with all but 12,800 acres onshore. At December 31, 2001, we had a 90% working interest in this permit and had fulfilled all current obligations under this permit. In late 1999, we completed our first exploratory well on this permit, the Rimu-A1, and a production test was performed. During the second half of 2000, we drilled and successfully tested two development wells, the Rimu-B1 and the Rimu-B2. In 2001 we drilled and tested three more Rimu development wells, the Rimu-A2, Rimu-A3 and Rimu-B3. The Rimu-A3 was successful; the Rimu-A2 and Rimu-B3 were dry. Early in 2002, the Rimu-A2 was sidetracked to the Tariki sand and is currently awaiting completion. The Rimu-B3 was also sidetracked in early 2002 and again was unsuccessful. In 2001, we also drilled the Kauri-A1 exploratory well, the Kauri-A2 development well, and the Kauri-B1 exploratory well. In the Kauri-A-1 we tested the Upper Tariki sands and still have further zones to test. The Kauri-A2 well successfully tested the Manutahi sands. The Kauri-B1 was drilled approximately 1.75 miles to the southeast of the Kauri-A pad and targeted the Manutahi sands. This well was plugged and abandoned in 2001. Our portion of the drilling, completion, and testing costs incurred on the wells within our permits during 2001 was approximately $26.0 million. Our portion of prospect costs on our permits during 2001 was approximately $5.1 million, which included obtaining 2-D seismic data in the last half of the year for the Rata prospect. We incurred $22.5 million on the production facilities that we expect to be commissioned near the end of the first quarter of 2002. In 2002, we plan to drill six development wells in the Rimu and Kauri areas, to participate in a non-operated exploratory well in another permit area, and to complete production facilities with $24.6 million budgeted to be spent. This compares to $54.5 million spent in 2001 and $17.4 million spent in 2000. Our New Zealand production is subject to a royalty which is a hybrid consisting of a 5% ad valorem royalty, or "AVR," and a 20% accounting profits royalty, or "APR." Until a mining permit is obtained for our producing area, only the AVR will apply to all production, and thereafter the royalty will be the greater of the AVR or APR, calculated on an annual basis. The AVR is based on net sales revenues. The APR is based on the excess of net sales revenues over allowable deductions, which deductions include production, capital, and indirect costs, but not interest or income tax expense or "head office costs" above 2.5% of other costs. Operating losses and capital costs may be carried forward to subsequent periods until fully utilized. In 2000, we entered into an agreement with Fletcher Challenge Energy Limited whereby we would earn a 25% participating interest in petroleum exploration permit 38730 containing approximately 48,900 acres. In May 2001, Fletcher relinquished their interest in the permit, and we then assumed 100% working interest in such permit by means of committing to an acceptable work plan. Such plan required us to acquire a minimum of 30 kilometers of new 2D seismic data, which we completed in 2001. Rather than commit to drill a new well in 2002 as the work plan called for, we surrendered this project in February 2002. Non-Operated Permits. In 1998, we entered into agreements for a 25% working interest in an exploration permit, permit 38712, held by Marabella Enterprises Ltd., a subsidiary of Bligh Oil & Minerals, an Australian company, and a 7.5% working interest held by Antrim Oil and Gas Limited, a Canadian company in a second permit, permit 38716, operated by Marabella. In turn, Bligh and Antrim each became 5% working interest owners in our permit 38719. Unsuccessful exploratory wells were drilled on these two permits, and we charged $0.4 million against earnings in 1998 and $0.3 million in 1999. All of the acreage on the permit 38712 was surrendered in 2000. The exploratory well on permit 38716 has been temporarily abandoned pending a further evaluation. It is currently anticipated that this well will be re-entered and sidetracked to target a location to the west of the initial well. A five-year extension was granted on permit 38716 in 2001 upon the surrender of 50% of the acreage. In 2000, we entered into an agreement with Fletcher Challenge Energy Limited whereby we will earn a 20% participating interest in petroleum exploration permit 38718 containing approximately 57,400 acres. In January 2001, the operator temporarily abandoned the Tuihu #1 exploratory well on permit 38718 pending further analysis. The permit now contains approximately 28,700 acres after a scheduled surrender during December 2000. Costs Incurred. During 2001, our costs incurred in New Zealand totaled $54.5 million, including $25.7 million for drilling, $5.5 million for prospect costs, $22.5 million for production facilities, and $0.8 million in evaluation costs for the acquisition of the TAWN assets, which closed in January 2002. These costs also included $0.6 million of costs incurred on permits operated by others: $0.2 million of drilling costs and $0.4 million of prospect costs. As of December 31, 2001, our investment in New Zealand totaled approximately $84.4 million. As we have recorded proved undeveloped reserves relating to our successful drilling activities, $45.5 million of our investment costs has been included in the proved properties portion of oil and gas properties and $38.8 million has been included as unproved properties at the end of 2001. Our development strategy includes having Rimu/Kauri production on line for oil and gas sales in New Zealand near the end of the first quarter of 2002. Russia In 1993, we entered into a Participation Agreement with Senega, a Russian Federation joint stock company, to assist in the development and production of reserves from two fields in Western Siberia and received a 5% net profits interest. We also purchased a 1% net profits interest. Our investment in Russia was fully impaired in the third quarter of 1998. We retain a minimum 6% net profits interest from the sale of hydrocarbon products from the fields. The value of our net profits interest depends upon either the successful development of production from the fields by others or their sale of the fields. Oil and Gas Reserves The following table presents information regarding proved reserves of oil and gas attributable to our interests in producing properties as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999. The information set forth in the table regarding reserves is based on proved reserves reports prepared by us and audited by H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc., Houston, Texas, independent petroleum engineers. Gruy’s audit was based upon review of production histories and other geological, economic, ownership, and engineering data provided by Swift.
In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines, estimates of future net revenues from our proved reserves and the PV-10 Value must be made using oil and gas sales prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties, except where such guidelines permit alternate treatment, including, in the case of gas contracts, the use of fixed and determinable contractual price escalations. Proved reserves as of December 31, 2001, were estimated based upon prices in effect at year-end. The weighted averages of such year-end prices domestically were $2.68 per Mcf of natural gas and $18.51 per barrel of oil, compared to $11.25 and $25.50 at year-end 2000 and $2.58 and $23.69 at year-end 1999. The weighted averages of such year-end 2001 prices for New Zealand were $1.18 per Mcf of natural gas and $18.25 per barrel of oil, compared to $0.71 and $22.30 in 2000. The weighted averages of such year-end 2001 prices for all our reserves, both domestically and in New Zealand, were $2.51 per Mcf of natural gas and $18.45 per barrel of oil, compared to $9.86 and $24.62 in 2000. We have interests in certain tracts that are estimated to have additional hydrocarbon reserves that cannot be classified as proved and are not reflected in the following table. The proved reserves presented for all periods also exclude any reserves attributable to the volumetric production payment that was in effect in 2000 and 1999. The table sets forth estimates of future net revenues presented on the basis of unescalated prices and costs in accordance with criteria prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and their PV-10 Value. Operating costs, development costs, and certain production-related taxes were deducted in arriving at the estimated future net revenues. No provision was made for income taxes. The estimates of future net revenues and their present value differ in this respect from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows set forth in Supplemental Information to our Consolidated Financial Statements, which is calculated after provision for future income taxes. At year-end 2001, 50% of the proved reserves were developed reserves. At year-end 2000, 45% of proved reserves were developed. Changes in quantity estimates and the estimated present value of proved reserves are affected by the change in crude oil and natural gas prices at the end of each year. While our total proved reserves quantities, on an equivalent Bcfe basis, at year-end 2001 increased by 3% over reserves quantities a year earlier, the PV-10 Value of those reserves decreased 74% from the PV-10 Value at year-end 2000. This decrease in prices resulted in 47.1 Bcfe of downward reserve revision, solely attributed to the decrease in prices used in 2001. Our total proved reserves quantities at year-end 2000 increased by 38% over reserves quantities a year earlier, while the PV-10 Value of those reserves increased 310% from the PV-10 Value at year-end 1999. The PV-10 Value decrease in 2001 and the PV-10 increase in 2000 were heavily influenced by pricing decreases at year-end 2001 as compared to year-end 2000 and by pricing increases from year-end 2000 as compared to year-end 1999. Product prices for natural gas decreased 75% during 2001, from $9.86 per Mcf at December 31, 2000, to $2.51 per Mcf at year-end 2001, while oil prices decreased 25% between the two dates, from $24.62 to $18.45 per barrel. Product prices for natural gas increased 282% during 2000, from $2.58 per Mcf at December 31, 1999, to $9.86 per Mcf at year-end 2000, while oil prices increased 4% between the two dates, from $23.69 to $24.62 per barrel. Product prices for natural gas increased 16% during 1999, from $2.23 per Mcf at December 31, 1998, to $2.58 per Mcf at year-end 1999, matched by a 111% increase in the price of oil between the two dates, from $11.23 to $23.69 per barrel. Proved reserves are estimates of hydrocarbons to be recovered in the future. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating the sizes of underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. The accuracy of any reserves estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserves reports of other engineers might differ from the reports contained herein. Results of drilling, testing, and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimates. Future prices received for the sale of oil and gas may be different from those used in preparing these reports. The amounts and timing of future operating and development costs may also differ from those used. Accordingly, reserves estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered. There can be no assurance that these estimates are accurate predictions of the present value of future net cash flows from oil and gas reserves. A portion of our proved reserves has been accumulated through our interests in the limited partnerships for which we serve as general partner. The estimates of future net cash flows and their present values, based on period end prices, assume that some of the limited partnerships in which we own interests will achieve payout status in the future. At December 31, 2001, 32 of the limited partnerships managed by us had achieved payout status. No other reports on our reserves have been filed with any federal agency. Oil and Gas Wells As we continue to liquidate partnerships for those partnerships which voted to do so, our total well count decreased. Acquisitions such as Lake Washington, where we own nearly a 100% interest in all operated wells, have increased well ownership on a net basis. The following table sets forth the gross and net wells in which we owned an interest at the following dates:
Oil and Gas Acreage As is customary in the industry, we generally acquire oil and gas acreage without any warranty of title except as to claims made by, through, or under the transferor. Although we have title to developed acreage examined prior to acquisition in those cases in which the economic significance of the acreage justifies the cost, there can be no assurance that losses will not result from title defects or from defects in the assignment of leasehold rights. In many instances, title opinions may not be obtained if in our judgment it would be uneconomical or impractical to do so. The following table sets forth the developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage held by us at December 31, 2001:
Partnerships Prior to 1995, we funded a substantial portion of our operations through 109 limited partnerships which we formed and for which we have served as managing general partner. These partnerships raised a total of $509.5 million of capital, with the largest portion (81%) raised to acquire interests in producing properties. Eight of the earliest partnerships and 13 of the most recently formed partnerships were created to drill for oil and gas. In all of these partnerships Swift paid for varying percentages of the capital or front-end costs and continuing costs of the partnerships and, in return, received differing percentage ownership interests in the partnerships, along with reimbursement of costs and/or payment of certain fees. At year-end 2001, we continued to serve as managing general partner of 71 of these various partnerships, of which 65 are production purchase partnerships that have been in existence from six to fifteen years and the remainder are drilling partnerships that have been in existence from three to five years. During 1997 and 1998, eight drilling partnerships formed between 1979 and 1985 and 21 of the production purchase partnerships sold their properties and were dissolved, in each case following a vote of the investors in the particular partnerships approving such liquidations. Between 1999 and 2001, the investors in all but six of the remaining partnerships voted to sell the properties or their interests in the partnerships and dissolve. During 2001, seven drilling partnerships and two production purchase partnerships were dissolved. We anticipate that the liquidation and dissolution of the additional 65 partnerships should be substantially completed by the end of 2002. The remaining six partnerships will continue to operate until their limited partners vote otherwise. Risk Management Our operations are subject to all of the risks normally incident to the exploration for and the production of oil and gas, including blowouts, cratering, pipe failure, casing collapse, oil spills, and fires, each of which could result in severe damage to or destruction of oil and gas wells, production facilities or other property, or individual injuries. The oil and gas exploration business is also subject to environmental hazards, such as oil spills, gas leaks, and ruptures and discharges of toxic substances or gases that could expose us to substantial liability due to pollution and other environmental damage. Additionally, as managing general partner of limited partnerships, we are solely responsible for the day-to-day conduct of the limited partnerships’ affairs and accordingly have liability for expenses and liabilities of the limited partnerships. We maintain comprehensive insurance coverage, including general liability insurance in an amount not less than $50.0 million, as well as general partner liability insurance. We believe that our insurance is adequate and customary for companies of a similar size engaged in comparable operations, but losses could occur for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Employees At December 31, 2001, we employed 209 persons. None of those employees were represented by a union. Relations with employees are considered to be good. Glossary of Abbreviations and Terms The following abbreviations and terms have the indicated meanings when used in this report: Bbl — Barrel or barrels of oil.Bcf — Billion cubic feet of natural gas.Bcfe — Billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (see Mcfe).BOE — Barrels of oil equivalent.Development Well — A well drilled within the presently proved productive area of an oil or natural gas reservoir, as indicated by reasonable interpretation of available data, with the objective of completing in that reservoir.Discovery Cost — With respect to proved reserves, a three-year average (unless otherwise indicated) calculated by dividing total incurred exploration and development costs (exclusive of future development costs) by net reserves added during the period through extensions, discoveries, and other additions.Dry Well — An exploratory or development well that is not a producing well.Exploratory Well — A well drilled either in search of a new, as yet undiscovered oil or natural gas reservoir or to greatly extend the known limits of a previously discovered reservoir.Gigajoules — A unit of energy equivalent to .95 Mcf of 1,000 Btu of natural gas.Gross Acre — An acre in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which a working interest is owned.Gross Well — A well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.MBbl — Thousand barrels of oil.Mcf — Thousand cubic feet of natural gas.Mcfe — Thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent, which is determined using the ratio of one barrel of oil, condensate, or natural gas liquids to 6 Mcf of natural gas.MMBbl — Million barrels of oil.MMBtu — Million British thermal units, which is a heating equivalent measure for natural gas and is an alternate measure of natural gas reserves, as opposed to Mcf, which is strictly a measure of natural gas volumes. Typically, prices quoted for natural gas are designated as price per MMBtu, the same basis on which natural gas is contracted for sale.MMcf — Million cubic feet of natural gas.MMcfe — Million cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (see Mcfe).Net Acre — A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.Net Well — A net well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.NGL — Natural gas liquid.Petajoules — A unit of energy equivalent to .95 Bcf of 1,000 Btu of natural gas.Producing Well — An exploratory or development well found to be capable of producing either oil or natural gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or natural gas well.Proved Developed Oil and Gas Reserves — Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.Proved Oil and Gas Reserves — The estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, that is, prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made.Proved Undeveloped Oil and Gas Reserves — Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.Proved Undeveloped (PUD) Locations — A location containing proved undeveloped reserves. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.PV-10 Value — The estimated future net revenues to be generated from the production of proved reserves discounted to present value using an annual discount rate of 10%. These amounts are calculated net of estimated production costs and future development costs, using prices and costs in effect as of a certain date, without escalation and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, such as general and administrative expenses, debt service, future income tax expense, or depreciation, depletion, and amortization.Reserves Replacement Cost — With respect to proved reserves, a three-year average (unless otherwise indicated) calculated by dividing total incurred acquisition, exploration, and development costs (exclusive of future development costs) by net reserves added during the period.SFAS — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards.TAWN — New Zealand producing properties acquired by Swift in January 2002. TAWN is comprised of the Tariki, Ahuroa, Waihapa and Ngaere fields.Volumetric Production Payment — The 1992 agreement pursuant to which we financed the purchase of certain oil and natural gas interests and committed to deliver certain monthly quantities of natural gas.-------------------------------------- Those portions of the Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, not included in this Annual Report to Shareholders (including certain portions of Item 1–Business pertaining to "Competition" and "Regulations," Item 3–Legal Proceedings, Item 4–Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders, Item 9–Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure, and Item 14–Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K), with no disclosures having been made as to Items 4 and 9, will be provided without charge to shareholders making a written request to Scott Espenshade, Director of Investor Relations, Swift Energy Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Suite 400, Houston, Texas 77060-6098. Exhibits filed as part of the Form 10-K will be provided to shareholders making a written request as set forth above at a reasonable charge sufficient to cover the Company’s cost in providing such exhibits.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Go to... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was last updated on Saturday, February 08, 2003, at 07:29:01 PM. Copyright © 1994-2008 by Swift Energy Company. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||